Letting anyone collect that data leaves it ripe for abuse by bullies, spies and hackers. More fundamentally, your Web history - like the color of your underpants - ain't nobody's business but your own. Cookies are how a pair of pants you look at in one site end up following you around in ads elsewhere.
But it doesn't share browsing data with Mozilla, which isn't in the data-collection business.Īt a minimum, Web snooping can be annoying. These little files are the hooks that data firms, including Google itself, use to follow what websites you visit so they can build profiles of your interests, income and personality.įirefox isn't perfect - it still defaults searches to Google and permits some other tracking. In a week of Web surfing on my desktop, I discovered 11,189 requests for tracker "cookies" that Chrome would have ushered right onto my computer but were automatically blocked by Firefox. Firefox unearthed a personal data caper of absurd proportions. Switching involved less inconvenience than you might imagine. It made me decide to ditch Chrome for a new version of nonprofit Mozilla's Firefox, which has default privacy protections. It turns out, having the world's biggest advertising company make the most popular Web browser was about as smart as letting kids run a candy shop. Lately I've been investigating the secret life of my data, running experiments to see what technology really gets up to under the cover of privacy policies that nobody reads. Seen from the inside, its Chrome browser looks a lot like surveillance software. This was made possible by the Web's biggest snoop of all: Google.
0 kommentar(er)
